01
Purpose, users & effective date
The question comes first. We establish why the appraisal is required, who will rely upon it, the relevant definition of value and the date to which the opinion applies.
Methodology
Yachts are heterogeneous assets in an often opaque market. A credible opinion therefore depends on disciplined research, informed comparison and transparent reasoning.
01
The question comes first. We establish why the appraisal is required, who will rely upon it, the relevant definition of value and the date to which the opinion applies.
02
Access, inspection requirements, specifications, records, refit history, maintenance information and any material limitations are identified.
03
The yacht is considered as an individual asset: design, builder, age, machinery, equipment, configuration, condition, provenance and capital history all influence market position.
04
Relevant sales, offerings and market intelligence are examined for comparability, timing and reliability. Evidence is weighed rather than accepted at face value.
05
Material differences are considered and the available indications are reconciled through professional judgment to reach a supportable conclusion.
06
The final report states the opinion, effective date, scope, significant assumptions, sources, reasoning and limitations so the conclusion can be understood in context.
The precise method and evidence vary with the assignment. The obligations of independence, relevance and clarity do not.
The conclusion is not shaped to support a preferred transaction, claim position or negotiating objective.
Information is handled with discretion and reporting is distributed in accordance with the engagement.
The investigation and report are designed around the asset, the question and the level of reliance—not a fixed template.
Confidential enquiries